Recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission relating to encashment of leave in respect of Central Government employees.
N0.14028/3/2008-Estt.(L)
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training
2nd Floor, Loknayak Bhavan, Khan Market
New Delhi, the 16th November, 2009
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject:- Recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission relating to encashment of leave in respect of Central Government employees.
The uudersigned is directed to refer to this Department's O.M. of even number dated 25th September, 2008 on the subiect mentioned above according to which encashment of leave in respect & central Government employees will be considered both for earned leave and half pay leave subject to overall limit of 300 days and in respect of encashment of half pay leave, no reduction shall be made on account of pension and pension equivalent of other retirement benefits. In case of shortfall in earned leave, no commutation of half pay leave is permissible. The order was made effective from the lst September, 2008. The matter was reconsidered in this Department in consultation with the Department of Expenditure (Implementation Cell) and it has been decided to modify the date of effect of this Department's 0.M of even number dated 25th September, 2008 to "01.01.2006 instead of 01.09.2008 subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The benefit will be admissible in respect of past cases on
receipt of applications to that effect from the pensioners
concerned by the Administrative Ministry concerned.
(ii) In respect of retirees who have already received encashment
of earned leave of maximum limit of 300 days together with
encashment of HPL standing at their credit on the date of
retirement, such cases need not be reopened. However, such
cases in which there was a shortfall in reaching the maximum
limit of 300 days can be reopened.
(iii) Calculation of cash equivalent in respect of HPL at credit shall be made mutatis mutandis in the manner given in this
Department's O.M. of even number dated 25.09.2008.
2. In respect of persons serving in the Indian Audit & Accounts
Departments, these O.M. issues with the concurrence of the Comptroller and
Auditor General of India.
4 comments:
Is this rule applied for employees died in service after 01-01-2006 with nil balance of EL and more days of credit in HPL?
i have been appointed in grade 1200-2040 in accounts department in the year 1987. after three years iwas promoted to grade 1400-2600 in the year 1991. consequnet on passing depatment examination i was promoted to grade 1640-2900 in the year 1992.due to my domestic circumsatances i could not continue and got reversion to the grade 1400-2600. i was promoted to 1640-2900(5500-9000)in the year 1997. i was promoted to 2000-3200 in the year 2007 due to reclassification of vacancies which has become nullamd void since it is after 01-01-2006. the adminstration now considers my promtion to the same grade 1640-2900 as twice and denies macp. is it correct? i feel since macp is a financial upgradation scheme promotion to the same grade pay should counted only once in the entire carreer. please give the views
have been appointed in grade 1200-2040 in accounts department in the year 1987. after three years iwas promoted to grade 1400-2600 in the year 1991. consequnet on passing depatment examination i was promoted to grade 1640-2900 in the year 1992.due to my domestic circumsatances i could not continue and got reversion to the grade 1400-2600. i was promoted to 1640-2900(5500-9000)in the year 1997. i was promoted to 2000-3200 in the year 2007 due to reclassification of vacancies which has become nullamd void since it is after 01-01-2006. the adminstration now considers my promtion to the same grade 1640-2900 as twice and denies macp. is it correct? i feel since macp is a financial upgradation scheme promotion to the same grade pay should counted only once in the entire carreer. please give the views
DA difference for encashment of Earned Leave in connection with LTC is applicable or not.
Post a Comment