IRTSA proposes to demand Seventh Pay Commission for Revision of wage structure wef 1.1.2011
IRTSA proposes to demand Seventh Pay Commission for Revision of wage structure wef 1.1.2011
Proposal to Demand Setting up of Seventh Pay Commission
IRTSA proposes to demand Seventh Pay Commission - For Revision of wage structure wef 1.1.2011
IRTSA invites comments from its members & other visitors to irtsa.net on the following demand - proposed to be raised soon:
Seventh CPC for Revision of wage structure of Central Government employees should be set up forthwith - for a revision of wage structure with effect from 1.1.2011 - on following grounds:
i) Implementation of 6th CPC would complete 5 year period on 1-1-2011. Government has conceded to effect wage revision in the case of PSU employees after every five years. The same critiria of 5 years shoud be adoptd for revision of wages of Central Government Employees and Pensioners
ii) D.A component in the wages would exceed 50% wef January, 2011. But merger of DA is not proposed to be done at this stage (as in the past) due to retrograde recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission to the contrary.
iii) The disparity with PSUs & Corporate Sector have increased further since Sixth CPC - and will now further increase especially due to fast improvement in economy.
iv) Anomalies in Sixth CPC Report & its implementation cannot apparently be removed - except by a Pay Commission since the Government is not ready to agree on any of the major issues of concern.
Harchandan Singh,
GS IRTSA
Courtesy : IRTSA
10 comments:
Dear Sir,
We should fight for:-
(1)Merger of 50 % DA with pay wef 01 Jan 2010 as DP.
(2)Increase of 25 % in allowances including HRA wef 01 jan 2011.
(3)Appointment of 7th CPC by Apr 2014 so that report is ready by Mar 2016.
I do not agree with the proposal for creation of 7th Pay Commission for Revision of Pay Structure. Rather we should fix a four tier governence machinery with a Consolidated Pay and Increment @ 30% after every three years. There should be an appropriate financial protection after Retirement viz. Pension, Medical. During service Period oppertunity should be given to provide an accommodation to be financed intitially by the Govt/Bank, to be repaid by the employees. If there are a good support for Regular Income, Retirement Protection, Medical Benefit and Residential Accommodation, what else a citizen of this country would demand? It is only Peace.Automatically it will come, of course not fully but substantially. I think everybody should expect employment for all rather increase of "Fat" Pay for a limited section of People.
I Acpect your demand for 7th CPC In 1-1-2011
All group A posts should be excluded from pay commission, recommendations in future
Dear Sir
I fully endorse Mr BP Singh,s remarks. Next pay commission should be set up at least two yrs before its due date so as to enable its inplementation by the due date.
Agree with you. Please go ahead. Work out the strategy and unitedly get the demands accepted. All the Best. R. H. Nag, Mumbai
The gap which were created in pay structure due to anamolies in VI pay commission like extra increment for those between Feb. to June 2006 is still awaited. these anamolies can only be rectified through VII pay commission.
Proposal to demand by the IRTSA for setting up of the seventh central pay commission is very much logical and correct. This must be appreciated and supported by one & all.The terms of reference for the pay commission must be properly evaluated to cover all the issues related not only to pay Structures only rather it must cover all service related problems, which must be resolved with very much sensitive mind.
I agree to your demand for 7th CPC In 1-1-2011
Dear all, let me clarify some mis-consideration, you all have.
1. The periodicity of pay revision in the case of PSU is 10 years, not 5 years as u mentioned.
2. You all talk about the basic scale difference between PSU and Central Govt employee. But you should know that in the case of PSU, there is no component called grade pay, where as in the case of central employee, the same exist. If you sum up both basic pay and grade pay, there is hardly any difference, again, the govt employee gets too many facility that the psu employee does not. For an example, when govt employee enjoys a DA rate of 45%, PSU employee gets 34.8% (July 2010). So all you have mentioned about the disparity between the pay structure between the PSU and Cetral Govt employee is not true.
Rakesh
Post a Comment